As Firs realizes that his life didn't really amount to much and slips away, the audience is stunned with his death. Isn't this a comedy? Chekhov, mocking this society, apparently throughout the play was making fun of a distressed little family. But, a comedy is supposed to end with a marriage, not death... so maybe we misinterrpreted his play. Maybe it isn't a comedy.
Since Chekhov is mocking society, and in life we generally think everything has a happy ending, then this could very well be a tragedy. Not only does Firs die, but his anagnorisis proves that that life has now meaning - no worth - "good for nothing".
Yet I don't think Chekhov would be that depressing with his writing. Personally, I think that he encorporated comedy and tragedy in order to create a completely real life scenario. Therefore everyone could interpret the play as either positive or negative whether they are optimistic or pessisimistic - just as they would interpret real life.
No comments:
Post a Comment